Montgomery County, MD. Private Investigators

Legal Eye Investigations, LLC. is a Maryland Licensed Private Investigation Agency.

We serve Ashton, Aspen Hill, Barnesville, Bethesda, Brookeville, Brookmont, Burtonsville, Cabin John, Chevy Chase, Clarksburg, Cloverly, Colesville, Damascus, Derwood, Fairland, Forest Glen, Four Corners, Friendship, Gaithersburg, Garrett Park, Germantown, Glen Echo, Kensington, Laytonsville, Leisure World, Montgomery Village, North Bethesda, Olney, Poolesville, Potomac, Rockville, Wheaton and White Oak, Maryland. 

A Child Custody Battle That Ends Deadly

In 2010, Hera McLeod met a man by the name of Joaquin Shadow Rams Sr. Hera graduated from George Washington University in Washington D.C. and then worked with Teach for America for a while. Eventually. She landed a job as an intelligence analyst at Booz Allen Hamilton. Hera met Joaquin through an online dating app. He told Hera that he was an aspiring musician. The two seemed to hit it off, and their relationship was coasting along. In July of 2011, Hera gave birth to a baby boy named Prince McLeod Rams and the couple was engaged to be married.

 

However, their wedding never happened. Not long after Prince was born, Hera learned that Joaquin had lied to her about his entire life. He lied about his job, his name, his age, even his family life. She also learned that Joaquin was a suspect in two murders, the murder of his mother, Alma Collins and of his ex-girlfriend Shawn Mason. 

 

Hera McLeod filed for full custody of Prince, stating that Joaquin was an unfit father, adding that he was also suspected of several murders and ran a pornography business. She also informed the court that two weeks after Prince was born, Joaquin threatened to kill her and held her at gunpoint. However, the judge ruled that Joaquin would in fact be allowed supervised visits. Several months later, that same judge changed it to unsupervised visits. Hera pleaded with courts, along with many witnesses, informing the judge about Joaquin’s fits of rage, his alleged abuse of his older son and how he allegedly raped McLeod’s sister. 

 

But the judge stated there was insufficient evidence of the alleged abuse by the father. “There’s a lot of smoke, with all that smoke I cannot see clearly,” said the family court judge in Montgomery County, Md. 

 

On October 20, 2012, during Joaquin’s first unsupervised visit, Joaquin drowned his son, Prince at a friend’s house in Manassas, Va. 

 

Hera later said, “I knew how bad this could get. … If the laws are not designed to protect children, then they need to be changed. In my son’s case, it appears as though death was the only threshold for denial of visitation…You wait until the child has been seriously harmed, and in my case dead, before the evidence reaches the threshold,” McLeod said. “You’re playing Russian roulette with kids’ lives in order to meet this unnecessary burden.”

 

Joaquin Shadow Rams Sr., 45, was convicted of capital murder and attempted false pretenses on April 13, 2013. After Rams spent four years in jail maintaining his own innocence, a Fairfax Circuit Court judge who heard the case this spring found that Rams either drowned or suffocated his son, baby Prince McLeod Rams, for the purpose of collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in insurance money. Prosecutors say Rams was motivated by greed, debt, sloth and opportunity to kill his son for over $500,000 in insurance payouts.

When Joaquin was convicted and later sentenced to life for killing Prince, Hera was present in court. She said to him, “I have to live the rest of my life with the fact that I wasn’t able to protect him from that monster. But you did not break me. I am not a victim. I am a survivor and maybe even a warrior. But I am no longer anyone’s victim…you are a pathetic excuse for a human being, may you rot in prison for the rest of your pathetic life and may the inmates treat you with the same mercy you showed my son.” 

 

Rams was sentenced to life in prison for the capital murder charge and 10 years for the attempted false pretenses charge. Attorneys representing Rams have already begun the appeals process.

 

poster_what-doesnt-kill-me_edited.jpg
legal-eye-child-custody-battle.webp

The highly publicized death of Prince Rams was an extreme case, but it serves as an example of a troubling pattern that domestic-violence experts say plagues child custody disputes: Too often, they assert, family courts deny a mother’s claims of domestic or child abuse and instead place a child in the care of a dangerous parent.

 

Advocates and lawyers have long shared anecdotal stories like McLeod’s — of women whose abuse claims weren’t believed and whose children were punished instead. But now, a first-of-its-kind study from George Washington University has shed light on how the phenomenon has played out in courts across the country.

 

The study, written by professor of clinical law Joan S. Meier, shows that mothers who report abuse — particularly child abuse — are losing child custody at staggering rates. To Meier, the data provides a window into what she considers a parallel to the #MeToo movement.

 

“MeToo was about women never being believed when they reported what was happening to them at work,” Meier said. “Well, this is about women not being believed when they’re reporting what’s happening at home. And it’s the courts . . . a much more troubling venue for disbelief.” Meier called the pattern a “complete betrayal of the mission” of the courts, which are supposed to prioritize the welfare of children.

 

“When they are abused, courts protect them less, not more,” said Meier, who will soon launch a National Family Violence Initiative at GW Law. The study was funded through a grant from the National Institute of Justice, the research, development and evaluation agency of the Justice Department.

'Adversarial' justice system

 

For the study, which has not yet been formally published, Meier and a team of researchers sorted through and coded published court opinions available online between 2005 and 2014, a data set of 4,388 custody cases. They sought to find out the extent to which courts were discrediting claims of abuse and removing custody from the parents claiming the abuse — and the role gender played in these findings. They also examined the impact of allegations in these cases that one parent was trying to “alienate” the child from the other parent.

The study broke down the types of abuse by domestic violence against the mother, child physical abuse and child sexual abuse.

 

According to the study, courts credited mothers’ reports of fathers’ abuse 36 percent of the time — including allegations of both child abuse and violence against the mother. When it came to child abuse specifically, courts were even less likely to believe mothers’ and children’s claims: 21 percent of the time for child physical abuse and 19 percent of the time for child sexual abuse.

 

In custody litigation, when mothers reported abuse — including child abuse and domestic violence — the mothers lost custody 28 percent of the time. But when fathers alleged abuse, the fathers lost custody only 12 percent of the time.

 

“The data in this study is very powerful in showing how much worse mothers had it when they alleged child abuse,” Meier said. “All the dots get connected.” Even when the father’s abuse is proved in the court, mothers alleging the abuse lost custody 13 percent of the time. But when a mother’s abuse was proved, fathers lost custody only 4 percent of the time — and only in cases where she had abused the father, never where she had abused the child.

 

“Even when the abuse is credited, women are losing,” Jane Aiken, dean of the School of Law at Wake Forest University, said after reading a copy of the study. “This is about not trusting women. I think it’s very powerful.”

 

The study also focused on the impact of a controversial claim often used in family courts across the country during custody proceedings — “parental alienation,” or the accusation that a parent is undermining or damaging the relationship between the child and the other parent. 

 

Meier and others have long argued that “alienation” is used overwhelmingly to punish mothers who accuse fathers of abuse. Mothers are often accused of leveling false abuse allegations merely to “alienate” the children from the father, Meier said.

 

“Women are expected to behave as mothers. But then when they come in and say ‘I’m trying to protect my child,’ then they’re not believed,” Aiken said. “You’re just in a trap, and it’s a gendered trap.”

 

Meier’s study found that when fathers claim alienation, courts are more than twice as likely to disbelieve mothers’ claims of abuse — either child abuse or abuse against the mother — than if the father made no alienation claim. That factor increases to four times as likely for child abuse cases, in particular.

 

For child sexual abuse, only 1 out of every 51 cases was believed when a father accused the mother of alienation. “When you go to court and you report child sexual abuse by the father, you’re done. You’re cooked,” Meier said. 

 

And when fathers claim alienation, the rate at which mothers lose custody shoots up from 26 percent to 44 percent.

 

Meier’s study also found a gender disparity: When either parent is accused of alienation, mothers have twice the likelihood of losing custody, compared with fathers. Even when a father contributed to the damaged relationship with his child, mothers frequently get blamed for it, Meier said. Often, she said, it’s on the mother “to pretend he’s a great father, and it’s not on him to repair his damage,” Meier said. “That is what’s so patriarchal.”

 

But in some cases, there was no gender divide: When a court found that a mother or father was an alienator, in both abuse and non-abuse cases, mothers and fathers lost custody at identical rates.

 

Meier acknowledged that the findings do not demonstrate that courts’ denials of abuse claims were wrong — only that they are happening at very high rates. And the study has several limitations, Meier said. It primarily analyzed cases that were appealed and that were published online, which is not a fully representative sample of trial court decisions.

 

The study also raised questions and concerns for Nicholas C. Bala, a law professor at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, and an expert on family law who researches issues related to parental alienation.

 

Bala said the study, while important and credible, does not distinguish between different severities of physical abuse, such as the difference between a shove and a brutal beating. He added that the most severe cases of child abuse don’t even make it to family court — they are handled by the police or child protective services. So the cases in Meier’s study are “already in a gray area” and are a “very skewed kind of sample.”

 

Still, Bala said Meier’s study highlights important points about a lack of education and training on domestic violence and child abuse in family courts, which he called an “adversarial” justice system.

'I had to be careful'

Despite the limitations of the study, Meier said it provides a rare empirical look at troubling trends that for too long have been merely anecdotal. Previous studies have been limited to single courts or single states, or have failed to factor in child abuse.

 

Many jurisdictions provide certain protections in custody cases involving domestic violence or abuse, but judges often have the liberty to rebut them. In the District, for example, a statute says that if a judge finds an incident of domestic violence occurred, ­judges shall award visitation only if they find that the “child and custodial parent can be adequately protected from harm inflicted by the other party.”

 

In Maryland, Gov. Larry Hogan (R) launched a new work group focused on studying how child-custody-court proceedings involving child abuse or domestic violence allegations are affecting children in the state.

 

One advocate involved in the new work group is McLeod, who often uses her son’s death to call for family court reform. McLeod recalled how, in her custody proceedings, her attorneys advised her to be careful what she said about her son’s father and how much detail to divulge about his abusive behavior.

 

“I was terrified for my son, but I had to be careful about what I said in court . . . if I acted in any way like I didn’t want my son to have access [to his father],” McLeod said. Another mother, Jacqueline Franchetti, testified in family court in New York about her ex-boyfriend’s verbally abusive behavior, including stalking, harassment and angry outbursts.

 

But the forensic evaluator in her case recommended joint custody of her toddler daughter, Kyra. The report from child protective services concluded there was no domestic violence and stated the case was “low risk,” Franchetti recalled.

 

Even after Franchetti noticed signs of distress and personality changes in her daughter after visits with her father, the child’s attorney dismissed her concerns, she said. Days later, in July 2016, Kyra’s father shot the toddler twice in the back in a home in Virginia, then set the house on fire and killed himself, police said.

Saturday marked three years since Kyra’s death.

“I should be with her,” Franchetti said. “I should be able to hug her when I go to bed at night and not be visiting her grave.”

Don't be a victim! Don't wait until it is too late! Here at Legal Eye, we hear you! Contact one of our Investigators now about your child custody case (410)921-5804 or click the button below:

                     START AN INVESTIGATION

legal-eye-investigations-child-custody-investigations.webp
joan-legal-eye.png
legal-eye-montgomery-county-md-.png