top of page
  • Writer's pictureDetective Williams

A Former Baltimore City Homicide Prosecutor has been indicted on 88 charges, including stalking, har

According to the indictment, Adam L Chaundry, a former Assistant State's Attorney in the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office Homicide Division knowingly, willfully, and intentionally took advantage of his position at the State's Attorney's Office to gain information on his former romantic partners. Documents detail the misconduct began around July 2019, when he subpoenaed telephone records of his first victim for his own personal use. He did the same for additional victims. In addition, Chaundry also had a theft scheme to steal phone records from Verizon Wireless and AT&T, issuing subpoenas to the companies to produce the victim's records.

From January 2019 to April 2021, Chaundry issued subpoenas for victim 1's phone records 33 times. From March 2019 to April 2021, he issued 25 subpoenas for victim 1's contacts, which included victims 3, 4, and 5. A year after their relationship ended and after being told to stop contacting her, Chaundry proceeded to send flowers to victim 1's home. He did not stop his attempts and instead requested an investigator with the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office do an "information work-up" on victim 1 and victim 3. Chaundry is also charged with stalking, and harassing victim 1 from January 2019 to April 2021, and stalking, and harassing victim 2 from February 2019 to April 2021.

The Office of The State Prosecutor released a statement on Tuesday:

Maryland State Prosecutor Charlton T. Howard III announced today that a Baltimore City Grand Jury has indicted former Baltimore City Assistant State’s Attorney Adam Lane Chaudry for charges that include Stalking, Extortion, Harassment, Obtaining Phone Records Without Authorization, Felony Theft Scheme, and Misconduct in Office. The 88-count indictment alleges that, while serving as an Assistant State’s Attorney in Baltimore City, Mr. Chaudry abused grand jury subpoenas and other court processes, as well as other official investigative tools, on multiple occasions for his personal purposes to obtain private telephone records and other information that he then used to stalk two former romantic partners. The indictment also alleges that he took advantage of his office to obtain telephone records related to his former romantic partners and their associates for years under false auspices, as well as extorting money from an individual on behalf of a friend.

“Our justice system, particularly the significant role, and power of the grand jury, relies on the integrity of law enforcement officials—especially prosecutors,” stated State Prosecutor Howard. “Our office will work to ensure public officials who abuse positions of trust and authority are investigated and, where appropriate, prosecuted.”

State Prosecutor Howard would like to acknowledge Deputy State Prosecutor Sarah R. David and Office of the State Prosecutor Special Agent John Sieracki for their work on this case. All individuals who are charged with a criminal offense are presumed to be innocent.

The City State's Attorney's Office also released a statement:

"Mr. Chaudry was terminated from his role as Assistant State’s Attorney soon after we concluded an internal investigation of the State Prosecutor’s allegations. His termination was effective on June 18, 2021. Immediately following our internal investigation, his cases were reassigned and reevaluated on the merits of each case, where to date, we’ve found no reason to question the legitimacy of his cases. We are unable to comment further about this open and pending matter." - Zy Richardson, Communications Director.


Maryland Stalking Laws

Stalking Section 3-802

In the state of Maryland, laws against stalking focus not on any one act, but on a “course of conduct” that as a whole leaves the victim in fear of being harmed in a number of ways. Specifically, a “course of conduct” is defined as a persistent pattern of conduct, occurring through a series of acts over time, that indicates a consistent and continuous purpose. Section 3-801.

It violates Maryland stalking laws (Section 3-802(c)) for an individual (1) to undertake a pernicious or evil-minded course of conduct (2) that includes pursuing and/or approaching the victim (3) where the perpetrator’s goal is to place, or the perpetrator knows or should have reasonably known the conduct would place, (4) the victim in reasonable fear of any of the following (see Section 3-802(a)):

  • ​Fear of serious bodily injury

  • Fear of assault (whether assault in the first or second degree)

  • Fear of rape, any sexual offense, attempted rape, or any attempted sexual offense (this includes any nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact as defined in Section 3-301)

  • Fear of being imprisoned without legal authority (also known as false imprisonment)

  • Fear of death

  • Fear that a third person may suffer any of the acts listed above

These stalking laws explicitly state that they do not apply to conduct that is performed to ensure a person’s compliance with a court order or performed to accomplish a specific lawful commercial purpose or to conduct that is protected, authorized, or required by local, state, or federal law. Section 3-802(b).

​If a person is guilty of stalking, then the individual faces conviction of a misdemeanor with up to five years in prison and/or a fine of $5,000 or less. Section 3-802(d).

The sentence for an individual convicted of stalking may be either separate from and consecutive to, or concurrent with, sentences for any other crimes arising from the same acts that violate this section. Section 3-802(e). This is particularly significant for a crime like stalking because a stalking offense necessarily requires an individual to commit a series of acts over time. Thus, if any of the acts that constitute part of the individual’s course of conduct are criminal, there is a heightened risk of the perpetrator facing multiple charges and serving multiple sentences (e.g., stalking and harassment).

Harassment Section 3-803

A person violates Section 3-803 and is guilty of harassment if the individual (1) engages in a malicious course of conduct (similar to stalking, see above) or commits a single act of following the victim around a public place (2) in such a manner that the victim becomes alarmed or seriously annoyed, (3) and the individual does so:

​After being given a reasonable request or warning to stop by the victim or by another person on behalf of the victim

With the intent to harass, annoy, or alarm the victim, and

Without a legal purpose for the conduct.

​It should be noted that this section on harassment does not apply to conducting part of a peaceable activity with the purpose of expressing political views or with the purpose of providing information to others. Section 3-803(b).

An individual guilty of harassment faces a conviction of a misdemeanor with penalties of up to 90 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $500. Section 3-803(c)(1).

If an individual has at least one prior conviction for harassment, then an individual guilty of violating this section faces up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000. Section 3-803(c)(2).

Misuse of Telephone Facilities and Equipment Section 3-804

By the name of the law, misuse of telephone facilities and equipment may not seem relevant to stalking and harassment legislation. Yet, the content of this section is aimed at prohibiting people from over-the-phone stalking and harassment. It is illegal under this section (Section 3-804(a)) for an individual to use telephones or cellular phones to:

​Make an (i) obscene, indecent, filthy, or lewd (ii) comment, proposal, suggestion, or request. Section 3-804(a)(3).

Make a phone call (i) anonymously (ii) the content of which would be reasonably expected to harass, embarrass, torment, distress, or annoy the person being called. Section 3-804(a)(1).

Make calls (i) repeatedly (ii) with the intent to annoy, torment, harass, distress, or embarrass the person being called. Section 3-804(a)(2).

This crime is a misdemeanor, and a person who is guilty of this offense faces up to three years in prison and/or a fine of up to $500. Section 3-804(b).

Misuse of Electronic Communication Section 3-805

Like the section described above, this law is designed to prohibit harassment perpetuated through electronic communication (which would include internet communication and even texting). Electronic communication is defined in Section 3-805(a) as any transmission of data, information, or communication through the use of electronic means (such as computers) that is sent to and received by a person.

It is illegal for any individual to (1) undertake a course of conduct (2) that is malicious (evil-minded, pernicious, with evil intent) (3) by means of electronic communication (4) that caused the victim to be alarmed and/or seriously annoyed (5) and the individual does this (see Section 3-805(b)):

​Intending to annoy, alarm, or harass the recipient of the electronic communication

After being reasonably warned or requested to stop by the recipient or by another person on behalf of the recipient and

Without a legal purpose

​Like the harassment law (Section 3-805(d)), this section does not apply to persons acting as part of a peaceable activity intended to express a political view or to provide information to others.

This crime is a misdemeanor, and any individual guilty of misuse of electronic miscommunication faces up to one year in jail and/or a fine of $500 or less. Section 3-805(e).

3 views0 comments



bottom of page